OFDM as downlink transmission scheme for LTE

Some of   the basic targets set for 3GPP LTE (Third Generation partnership project Long term Evolution) are high data rate at cell edge, low delay, spectrum flexibility and maximum commonality between FDD(Frequency Division Duplex) and TDD(Time Division Duplex). Major upgrade that can help to achieve set targets is to increase bandwidth of operation. Thus give rise of wideband transmission. There is close relation between bandwidth and the rate of data transmission and can be understand by Shannon’s equation for channel capacity ‘C’

                                                  C =  BW* log2(1+ S/N)

 S = received signal power             N = power of white Noise

Now assuming information rate be ‘R’ bits/sec

Therefore

                                  S = Eb*R                                    Eb = Energy  per bit information

Also                          

                                 N= No.BW               No= Power spectral density of  White Noise

 But as information rate is always less than the channel capacity i.e. we have

 R    C = BW* log2(1+ S/N)

                                    = BW* log2(1+  (Eb.R)/(No.BW))

 Now a term define as radio link Bandwidth Utilization γ as

          γ  =  R/ BW      log2(1+  (Eb/No) γ)

 Hence using above  equation‘s inequality  we can find lower bound  on the required received  energy per bit of information normalised to the noise power  density  as

        Eb/No     min{ Eb/No  }  =  (2 γ-1)  / γ.

 A plot for above equation  is shown in Figure.1 (reproduce)

 

OFDM bandwidth utilization

OFDM bandwidth utilization

Figure .1 Minimum required Eb/N0 at the receiver as a function of bandwidth utilization

As seen from figure 1 the operation performed for bandwidth utilization factor  γ > 1 , the required signal power at the receiver must be high. Thus for energy efficient operation  γ must be less than or equal to 1 i.e. for higher data rate , bandwidth must be increased in the same proportion and the main target for the evolution of 3G mobile communication is the provisioning of higher data rate with good coverage. However there are some critical issues related to wider bandwidth transmission like

·         Spectrum is often a scarce and expensive resource, and it may be difficult to find spectrum allocations of sufficient size to allow for very wideband transmission, especially at lower-frequency bands.

 ·         Wider transmission bandwidth has a direct impact on the transmitter and the receiver sampling rates, and thus on the complexity and power consumption of digital-to-analog and analog-to-digital converters as well as front-end digital signal processing. RF components are also, in general, more complicated to design and more expensive to produce, the wider the bandwidth they are to handle.

 ·         Causes increased corruption of the transmitted signal due to time dispersion on the radio channel. Time dispersion occurs when the transmitted signal propagates to the receiver via multiple paths with different delays.    In the frequency domain, a time-dispersive channel corresponds to a non-constant channel frequency response. This radio-channel frequency selectivity will corrupt the frequency-domain structure of the transmitted signal and lead to higher error rates for given signal-to-noise/interference ratios.

 

Multi-path propagation causing time dispersion and radio-channel frequency selectivity.

Multi-path propagation causing time dispersion and radio-channel frequency selectivity.

 

Receiver-side equalization has been used against radio channel frequency selectivity but is effective for narrowband transmission. However, if the transmission bandwidth is increased up to, for example 20 MHz, which is the target for the 3GPP Long-Term Evolution, the complexity of equalization is very high. In the following, two  approaches to wider-band transmission will be discussed:

1. The use of different types of multi-carrier transmission, that is transmitting an overall wider-band signal as several more narrowband frequency-multiplexed signals. One special case of multi-carrier transmission is OFDM transmission.

2. The use of specific single-carrier transmission schemes, especially designed to allow for efficient but still reasonably low-complexity equalization, not discussed here anymore as out of the scope of topic.  

Multi-carrier transmission

Multi-carrier transmission implies that, instead of transmitting a single more wideband signal, multiple more narrowband signals, often referred to as subcarriers, are frequency multiplexed and jointly transmitted over the same radio link to the same receiver. Block diagrams are shown for narrowband and wideband transmission.

 

Extension to wider transmission bandwidth by means of multi-carrier transmission

Extension to wider transmission bandwidth by means of multi-carrier transmission

Figure 3 Extension to wider transmission bandwidth by means of multi-carrier transmission

A drawback of multi-carrier transmission is that, the parallel transmission of multiple carriers will lead to larger variations in the instantaneous transmit power. Thus, multi-carrier transmission will have a negative impact on the transmitter power-amplifier efficiency, implying increased transmitter power consumption and increased power-amplifier cost. Alternatively, the average transmit power must be reduced, implying a reduced range for a given data rate. For this reason, multi-carrier transmission is more suitable for the downlink (base-station transmission), compared to the uplink (mobile-terminal transmission), due to the higher importance of high power-amplifier efficiency at the mobile terminal. 

The main advantage with the kind of multi-carrier extension outlined in Figure 3 is that it provides a very smooth evolution, in terms of both radio equipment and spectrum, of an already existing radio-access technology to wider transmission bandwidth and a corresponding possibility for higher data rates, especially for the downlink. 

Now we  will discuss,  a different approach to multi-carrier transmission, based on so-called OFDM technique. OFDM has been adopted as the downlink transmission scheme for the 3GPP Long-Term Evolution (LTE) and is also used for several other radio technologies, e.g. WiMAX and the DVB broadcast technologies 

Basic principles of OFDM

 Transmission by means of OFDM can be seen as a kind of multi-carrier transmission. The basic characteristics of OFDM transmission, which distinguish it from a straightforward multi-carrier extension of a more narrowband transmission scheme are: 

The use of a relatively large number of narrowband subcarriers. In contrast, a straightforward multi-carrier extension as discussed previously, would typically consist of only a few subcarriers, each with a relatively wide bandwidth. As an example, a WCDMA multi-carrier evolution to a 20MHz overall transmission bandwidth could consist of four subcarriers, each with a bandwidth in the order of 5 MHz. In comparison, OFDM transmission may imply that several hundred subcarriers are transmitted over the same radio link to the same receiver. 

Simple rectangular pulse shaping as illustrated in Figure 4a. This corresponds to a sinc-square-shaped per-subcarrier spectrum, as illustrated in Figure 4b. 

Tight frequency-domain packing of the subcarriers with a subcarrier spacing ∆f =1/Tu, where Tu is the per-subcarrier modulation-symbol time (see Figure 5). The subcarrier spacing is thus equal to the per-subcarrier modulation rate 1/Tu.                      

 

Per-subcarrier pulse shape and spectrum for basic OFDM transmission

Per-subcarrier pulse shape and spectrum for basic OFDM transmission

Figure 4.  Per-subcarrier pulse shape and spectrum for basic OFDM transmission

 

OFDM subcarrier spacing.

OFDM subcarrier spacing.

Figure 5. OFDM subcarrier spacing.

 In complex baseband notation, a basic OFDM signal x(t) during the time interval

mTu   t < (m+1)Tu can thus be expressed as

 

OFDM notation

OFDM notation

where xk(t) is the kth modulated subcarrier with frequency  fk =k*f and ak(m) is the, modulation symbol applied to the kth subcarrier during the mth OFDM symbol interval, i.e. during the time interval mTu t <(m+1)Tu. OFDM transmission is thus block based, implying that, during each OFDM symbol interval, Nc modulation symbols are transmitted in parallel. The modulation symbols can be from any modulation alphabet, such as QPSK, 16QAM, or 64QAM.

 

OFDM modulation

OFDM modulation

 

Figure 6. OFDM modulation

The term Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex is due to the fact that two modulated OFDM subcarriers xk1 (t) and xk2 (t) are mutually orthogonal over the time interval         mTu   t < (m+1)Tu, i.e.

 

ofdm orthogoanl

ofdm orthogoanl

 

The ‘physical resource’ in case of OFDM transmission is often illustrated as a time–frequency grid according to Figure 7 where each ‘column’ corresponds to one OFDM symbol  and each ‘row’ corresponds to one OFDM subcarrier. 

 

OFDM time–frequency grid

OFDM time–frequency grid

Figure 7. OFDM time–frequency grid

OFDM demodulation

Figure.8 illustrates the basic principle of OFDM demodulation consisting of a bank of correlators, one for each subcarrier. Taking into account the orthogonality between subcarriers, it is clear that, in the ideal case, two OFDM subcarriers do not cause any interference to each other after demodulation. Thus the avoidance of interference between OFDM subcarriers is not simply due to a subcarrier spectrum separation , rather due to the specific frequency-domain structure of each subcarrier in combination with the specific choice of a subcarrier spacingf equal to the per-subcarrier symbol rate 1/Tu.  To make an OFDM signal truly robust to radio-channel frequency selectivity, cyclic-prefix insertion is typically used, as will be further .

 

Basic principle of OFDM demodulation

Basic principle of OFDM demodulation

 

Figure 8. Basic principle of OFDM demodulation

Cyclic-prefix insertion

As described in  previous Section , an uncorrupted OFDM signal can be demodulated without any interference between subcarriers. However, in case of a time-dispersiv  channel the orthogonality between the subcarriers will, at least partly, be lost. The reason for this loss of subcarrier orthogonality in case of a time-dispersive channel is that, in this case, the demodulator correlation interval for one path will overlap with the symbol boundary of a different path, as illustrated in Figure 9. Thus, the integration interval will not necessarily correspond to an integer number of periods of complex exponentials of that path as the modulation symbols ak may differ between consecutive symbol intervals. As a consequence, in case of a time-dispersive channel there will not only be inter-symbol interference within a subcarrier but also interference between subcarriers. Another way to explain the interference between subcarriers in case of a time dispersive channel is to have in mind that time dispersion on the radio channel is equivalent to a frequency-selective channel frequency response. As clarified, orthogonality between OFDM subcarriers is not simply due to frequency-domain separation but due to the specific frequency-domain structure of each subcarrier. Even if the frequency-domain channel is constant over a bandwidth corresponding to the main lobe of an OFDM subcarrier and only the subcarrier side lobes are corrupted due to the radio-channel frequency selectivity, the orthogonality between subcarriers will be lost with inter-subcarrier interference as a consequence. Due to the relatively large side lobes of each OFDM subcarrier, already a relatively limited amount of time dispersion or, equivalently, a relatively modest radio-channel frequency selectivity may cause non-negligible interference between subcarriers.

 

Time dispersion and corresponding received-signal timing

Time dispersion and corresponding received-signal timing

 

Figure 9 Time dispersion and corresponding received-signal timing.

To deal with this problem and to make an OFDM signal truly insensitive to time dispersion on the radio channel, so-called cyclic-prefix insertion is typically used in case of OFDM transmission. As illustrated in Figure 10, cyclic-prefix insertion implies that the last part of the OFDM symbol is copied and inserted at the beginning of the OFDM symbol. Cyclic-prefix insertion thus increases the length of the OFDM symbol from Tu to Tu +TCP, where TCP is the length of the cyclic prefix, with a corresponding reduction in the OFDM symbol rate as a consequence. As illustrated in the lower part of Figure 10, if the correlation at the receiver side is still only carried out over a time interval Tu =1/∆f , subcarrier orthogonality will then be preserved also in case of a time-dispersive channel, as long as the span of the time dispersion is shorter than the cyclic-prefix length.

 

Cyclic-prefix insertion

Cyclic-prefix insertion

 

Figure 10. Cyclic-prefix insertion

Cyclic-prefix insertion is beneficial in the sense that it makes an OFDM signal insensitive to time dispersion as long as the span of the time dispersion does not exceed the length of the cyclic prefix. The drawback of cyclic-prefix insertion is that only a fraction Tu /( Tu +TCP) of the received signal power is actually utilized by the OFDM demodulator, implying a corresponding power loss in the demodulation. In addition to this power loss, cyclic-prefix insertion also implies a corresponding loss in terms of bandwidth as the OFDM symbol rate is reduced without a corresponding reduction in the overall signal bandwidth. One way to reduce the relative overhead due to cyclic-prefix insertion is to reduce the subcarrier spacing f , with a corresponding increase in the symbol time Tu as a consequence.

 Frequency diversity with OFDM: importance of channel coding

As discussed in previous Sections , a radio channel is always subject to some degree of frequency selectivity, implying that the channel quality will vary in the frequency domain. In case of a single wideband carrier, such as a WCDMA carrier, each modulation symbol is transmitted over the entire signal bandwidth. Thus, in case of the transmission of a single wideband carrier over a highly frequency-selective channel (see Figure 11a), each modulation symbol will be transmitted both over frequency bands with relatively good quality (relatively high signal strength) and frequency bands with low quality (low signal strength). Such transmission of information over multiple frequency bands with different instantaneous channel quality is also referred to as frequency diversity.

 

Transmission of single wideband carrier and OFDM transmission over a frequency- selective channel.

Transmission of single wideband carrier and OFDM transmission over a frequency- selective channel.

 

Figure 11. Transmission of single wideband carrier and OFDM transmission over a frequency- selective channel.

On the other hand, in case of OFDM transmission each modulation symbol is mainly confined to a relatively narrow bandwidth. Thus, in case of OFDM transmission over a frequency-selective channel, certain modulation symbols may be fully confined to a frequency band with very low instantaneous signal strength as illustrated in Figure 11b. Thus, the individual modulation symbols will typically not experience any substantial frequency diversity even if the channel is highly frequency selective over the overall OFDM transmission bandwidth. As a consequence, the basic error-rate performance of OFDM transmission over a frequency-selective channel is relatively poor and especially much worse than the basic error rate in case of a single wideband carrier.

 However, in practice channel coding is used in most cases of digital communication and especially in case of mobile communication. Channel coding implies that each bit of information to be transmitted is spread over several, often very many, code bits. If these coded bits are then, via modulation symbols, mapped to a set of OFDM subcarriers that are well distributed over the overall transmission bandwidth of the OFDM signal, as illustrated in Figure 12, each information bit will experience frequency diversity in case of transmission over a radio channel that is frequency selective over the transmission bandwidth, despite the fact that the subcarriers, and thus also the code bits, will not experience any frequency diversity. Distributing the code bits in the frequency domain, as illustrated in Figure 12, is sometimes referred to as frequency interleaving. Thus, in contrast to the transmission of a single wideband carrier, channel coding (combined with frequency interleaving) is an essential component in order for OFDM transmission to be able to benefit from frequency diversity on a frequency selective channel. As channel coding is typically anyway used in most cases of mobile communication this is not a very serious drawback, especially taking into account that a significant part of the available frequency diversity can be captured already with a relatively high code rate.

 

Channel coding in combination with frequency-domain interleaving to provide frequency diversity in case of OFDM transmission

Channel coding in combination with frequency-domain interleaving to provide frequency diversity in case of OFDM transmission

Figure 12. Channel coding in combination with frequency-domain interleaving to provide frequency diversity in case of OFDM transmission.

OFDM as a user-multiplexing and multiple-access scheme

The discussion has, until now, implicitly assumed that all OFDM subcarriers are transmitted from the same transmitter to a certain receiver, i.e.:

downlink transmission of all subcarriers to a single mobile terminal.

uplink transmission of all subcarriers from a single mobile terminal.

 However, OFDM can also be used as a user-multiplexing or multiple-access scheme, allowing for simultaneous frequency-separated transmissions to/from multiple mobile terminals (see Figure 13.). In the downlink direction, OFDM as a user-multiplexing scheme implies that, in each OFDM symbol interval, different subsets of the overall set of available subcarriers are used for transmission to different mobile terminals (see Figure 13a). Similarly, in the uplink direction, OFDM as a user-multiplexing or multiple-access scheme implies that, in each OFDM symbol interval, different subsets of the overall set of subcarriers are used for data transmission from different mobile terminals(see Figure 13b).  

 

OFDM as a user-multiplexing/multiple-access scheme: (a) downlink and (b) uplink.

OFDM as a user-multiplexing/multiple-access scheme: (a) downlink and (b) uplink.

Figure 13. OFDM as a user-multiplexing/multiple-access scheme: (a) downlink and (b) uplink.

 

Distributed user multiplexing

Distributed user multiplexing

Figure 14.  Distributed user multiplexing.

In this case, the term Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access or OFDMA is also often used. Figure 13. assumes that consecutive subcarriers are used for transmission to/from the same mobile terminal. However, distributing the subcarriers to/from a mobile terminal in the frequency domain is also possible as illustrated in Figure 14.. The benefit of such distributed user multiplexing or distributed multiple access is a possibility for additional frequency diversity as each transmission is spread over a wider bandwidth.

 Thus as far as downlink transmission scheme  is concern OFDM fulfill all the desired target for 3G-LTE. Along with the efficient utilization of available spectrum, OFDM provide smooth transition from already established  narrow band transmission system to high data rate wideband transmission. There many other services that a network operator suppose to provide to network  user, OFDM supports many of them, like MBMS(Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service) . Multiple Input / Multiple output (MIMO) wireless system, also can enjoy easier implementation with  OFDM. As far as future exploration  is concern , Channel Estimation is one of such area that  in case of OFDM. 

What is Single Carrier FDMA (SC FDMA)?

Today multi-carrier transmission and OFDM are means to allow for very high overall transmission bandwidth while still being robust to signal corruption due to radio-channel frequency selectivity. However, a drawback of OFDM modulation, as well as any kind of multi-carrier transmission, is the large variations in the instantaneous power of the transmitted signal. Such power variations imply a reduced power-amplifier efficiency and higher power-amplifier cost. This is especially critical for the uplink, due to the high importance of low mobile-terminal power consumption and cost. Several methods have been proposed on how to reduce the large power variations of an OFDM signal. However, most of these methods have limitations in terms of to what extent the power variations can be reduced. Furthermore, most of the methods also imply a significant computational complexity and/or a reduced link performance. Thus, there is an interest to consider also wider-band single-carrier transmission as an alternative to multi-carrier transmission, especially for the uplink, i.e. for mobile-terminal transmission. One of such single-carrier transmission scheme can be implemented using DFT-spread OFDM

DFT-spread OFDM
DFT-spread OFDM (DFTS-OFDM) is a transmission scheme that can combine the desired properties for uplink transmission i.e. :
• Small variations in the instantaneous power of the transmitted signal (‘single carrier’ property).
• Possibility for low-complexity high-quality equalization in the frequency domain.
• Possibility for FDMA with flexible bandwidth assignment.
Due to these properties, DFTS-OFDM has been selected as the uplink transmission scheme for LTE, which is the long-term 3G evolution.

Basic principles
The basic principle of DFTS-OFDM transmission is illustrated in Figure 1. Similar to OFDM Modulation, DFTS-OFDM relies on block-based signal generation.

 

DFTS-OFDM signal generation

DFTS-OFDM signal generation

Fig-1 DFTS-OFDM signal generation

 

In case of DFTS-OFDM, a block of M modulation symbols from some modulation alphabet, e.g. QPSK or 16QAM, is first applied to a size-M DFT. The output of the DFT is then applied to consecutive inputs of a size-N inverse DFT where N >M and where the unused inputs of the IDFT are set to zero. Typically, the inverse- DFT size N is selected as N =2n for some integer n to allow for the IDFT to be implemented by means of computationally efficient radix-2 IFFT. Also similar to OFDM, a cyclic prefix is preferable inserted for each transmitted block , the presence of a cyclic prefix allows for straightforward low-complexity frequency-domain equalization at the receiver side.

If the DFT size M would equal the IDFT size N, the cascaded DFT and IDFT blocks of Figure would completely cancel out each other. However, if M is smaller than N and the remaining inputs to the IDFT are set to zero, the output of the IDFT will be a signal with ‘single-carrier’ properties, i.e. a signal with low power variations, and with a bandwidth that depends on M. More specifically, assuming a sampling rate fs at the output of the IDFT, the nominal bandwidth of the transmitted signal will be BW =M/N * fs. Thus, by varying the block size M the instantaneous bandwidth of the transmitted signal can be varied, allowing for flexible-bandwidth assignment. Furthermore, by shifting the IDFT inputs to which the DFT outputs are mapped, the transmitted signal can be shifted in the frequency domain.

The main benefit of DFTS-OFDM, compared to a multi-carrier transmission scheme such as OFDM, is reduced variations in the instantaneous transmit power, implying the possibility for increased power-amplifier efficiency. This benefit of DFTS-OFDM is illustrated in Figure, which illustrates the distribution of the Peak-to-Average-power Ratio (PAR) for DFTS-OFDM and conventional OFDM.

The PAR is defined as the peak power within one IDFT block (one OFDM symbol) normalized by the average signal power. It should be noted that the PAR distribution is not the same as the distribution of the instantaneous transmit power as illustrated in Figure 2. Historically, PAR distributions have often been used to illustrate the power variations of OFDM.

 

PAR distribution for OFDM and DFTS-OFDM, respectively.

PAR distribution for OFDM and DFTS-OFDM, respectively.

 

 

Fig-2 PAR distribution for OFDM and DFTS-OFDM, respectively. Solid curve: QPSK. Dashed curve: 16QAM.

As can be seen in Figure 2, the PAR is significantly lower for DFTS-OFDM, compared to OFDM. In case of 16QAM modulation, the PAR of DFTS-OFDM increases. On the other hand, in case of OFDM the PAR distribution is more or less independent of the modulation scheme. The reason is that, as the transmitted OFDM signal is the sum of a large number of independently modulated subcarriers, the instantaneous power has an approximately exponential distribution, regardless of the modulation scheme applied to the different subcarriers.

A better measure of the impact on the required power-amplifier back-off and the corresponding impact on the power-amplifier efficiency is given by the so-called cubic metric .The cubic metric is a measure of the amount of additional back off needed for a certain signal wave form, relative to the back-off needed for some reference wave form. As can be seen from Figure2, the cubic metric (given to the right of the graph) follows the same trend as the PAR. However, the differences in cubic metric are somewhat smaller than the corresponding differences in PAR.